@ThroneOfCrypto Many of these publishers also are prone to financial influences, and their has been cases where the publisher withdraws a study if it 5urnw out to be controversial. Ofcourse they the find a statement to justify their reteaction https://t.co
RT @HJoyceGender: As Paul below points out - not the main Lancet, but a sub-publication. And for those who didn't know - the Lancet gave cr…
RT @scaredofrobots: @WokeEnough @GlauSciathan @jonathanolfert @LancetChildAdol And it took them 12 YEARS to admit it and retract the 🐂💩 htt…
RT @HJoyceGender: As Paul below points out - not the main Lancet, but a sub-publication. And for those who didn't know - the Lancet gave cr…
@Nancy_M_K @TheLancet https://t.co/lu86wUUP5u The Lancet has sometimes made mistakes. MMR was a whopper. The tide is starting to turn, with experience and evidence; 80-90% of children desist and resolve their feelings of dysphoria; it’s reasonable and eth
RT @HJoyceGender: As Paul below points out - not the main Lancet, but a sub-publication. And for those who didn't know - the Lancet gave cr…
RT @HJoyceGender: As Paul below points out - not the main Lancet, but a sub-publication. And for those who didn't know - the Lancet gave cr…
This
As Paul below points out - not the main Lancet, but a sub-publication. And for those who didn't know - the Lancet gave credence to the discredited BS from Andrew Wakefield about MMR vaccine causing autism - took them 12 years to retract https://t.co/vz3Dpw
@WokeEnough @GlauSciathan @jonathanolfert @LancetChildAdol And it took them 12 YEARS to admit it and retract the 🐂💩 https://t.co/1cqNnQ0tq2
@CornBardSupreme @devtrospective No, they literally retract it and draw lines through it. This study was edited for copyright reasons https://t.co/dMslHDwvTq
@soniafaleiro @TheLancet I know who to trust. I am not toolkit jeevi parasite like you. Here's credibility of @TheLancet . If you don't understand feel free to discuss with another toolkit jeevi parasite. https://t.co/ZIG3KuRAGe
@muthukrishnanv @sachinkunal114 @SowMe18 @Go_Movie_Mango https://t.co/2DPGEW08MR details available here.
@ThoughtPower1 @YourRishbh @RahulGandhi I knew you will mention Lancet. 😂😂😂 I bet you didn't know Lancet has a history of publishing unscientific papers. Read this dum dum. Pappu ke chele pappu jaise hi honge. https://t.co/uCDEXqvTZs
@Squad_Six_Mom @robertojaroszuk @NC_Governor Not trying to argue. Just I have read up on this .Scientific Studies have been done that show their is no link to autism . Dr. Andrew Wakefield was the one who put out this article yrs ago about vaccine &aut
RT @EnglishJulinDog: @KurisuS There actually was a paper in The Lancet by Andrew Wakefield that started the whole mess. The paper was later…
RT @EnglishJulinDog: @KurisuS There actually was a paper in The Lancet by Andrew Wakefield that started the whole mess. The paper was later…
@KurisuS There actually was a paper in The Lancet by Andrew Wakefield that started the whole mess. The paper was later retracted because of fraud and Wakefield lost his medical license. https://t.co/nYZsdiFnD4
RT @Novaesoul: @mama7cena The scientist who linked vaccines to Autism retracted his statement. There has never been a link https://t.co/7m…
RT @Novaesoul: @mama7cena The scientist who linked vaccines to Autism retracted his statement. There has never been a link https://t.co/7m…
@mama7cena The scientist who linked vaccines to Autism retracted his statement. There has never been a link https://t.co/7mX9pMxGoz https://t.co/vD6KuiQuJa
@KeithFarnish @forrestmaready The Wakefield thing is a lie. The Lancet retracted the article because they felt the findings were “incorrect, contrary to the findings of an earlier investigation.” https://t.co/LFtjF1FPiO https://t.co/NASoK7mVZ3
@teddyboylocsin Here's an example of an article published in the Lancet & accepted by the public without critical appraisal. It resulted in millions of MMR anti-vaxers. https://t.co/Yl3H1X0gBz
RT @zr1100c3: @JMW0898 @GovCanHealth The original "study" that linked autism to vaccines was found to be false and retracted by the origina…
@JMW0898 @GovCanHealth The original "study" that linked autism to vaccines was found to be false and retracted by the original publisher. https://t.co/TxxjCy94Yk
@TheLancet @TheLancetPsych The Lancet has zero credibility and needs to shut down. https://t.co/W3G7UlWkEP
@Soos808 The Lancet was also the publication that accepted the false Andrew Wakefield study, which claimed vaccines cause autism, fyi. So I don't trust the name Lancet. Like I think they should close. https://t.co/W3G7UlWkEP
@MMwakulomba @khudiidii The original authors of the one (1) study “linking” autism to vaccines actually retracted their findings and have since made statements apologizing to the autism community. https://t.co/NOTAfIWYfj
@tmallard @MSFTEnable @MSFTnews Just one: https://t.co/Env2g5AbGn Emeritus doesn’t mean that they are free to post rubish. I have many friends that work with autism! NONE support your YouTube-based hypothesis
@randy_shafer @tardislove18 @Ecsullie @EveUpWon @AlexBerenson @marc_benton You mean this? The Dr was on the payroll of the Anti-vaxxers so he fudged the statistics to have the outcome he wanted. https://t.co/qjM3bUhrEF
It's behind a paywall, but it does show the date it was published, which is 2009. Come on. Old shit. Stop using the ASAN handbook. The Wakefield study wasn't even retracted until 2010. https://t.co/wVaWmdlTPc
@m_pokraculja @CMiklavcic Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://t.co/ABpvj9TaAT
@VVSarahG @panthernoster 👇 This #retracted piece? https://t.co/FxVSSKUfb3 #ScienceMatters
They were not vaccine injured. Childhood vaccines do NOT cause disability. This conclusion resulted from a poorly conducted &biased study. The study was redacted & disproven by the scientific community. If you need proof, you can read more about it
@RetractionWatch Is this a parody publication? Approaching April Fools Day Amuse Bouche? @TheLancet Editors providing guidance on the process for “Swift and open transparent correction of the public record?” Seriously? https://t.co/f0yECwDzmR
Never seen this before: Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://t.co/vTMyFNX5Wv
@marcelo_barueta @DoctorKruz No nos olvidemos de esto: https://t.co/Zu0aM4jMVA
RT @SeeingRedNE: @ChrisDunkerLJS Someone pointed out to us that today is “retraction day” or the anniversary date of when Andrew Wakefield'…
RT @SeeingRedNE: @ChrisDunkerLJS Someone pointed out to us that today is “retraction day” or the anniversary date of when Andrew Wakefield'…
RT @SeeingRedNE: @ChrisDunkerLJS Someone pointed out to us that today is “retraction day” or the anniversary date of when Andrew Wakefield'…
@ChrisDunkerLJS Someone pointed out to us that today is “retraction day” or the anniversary date of when Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent "study" linking MMR vaccination and autism was formally retracted on 2/4/2010. https://t.co/mUmW9wDqyB
@sbeker @feinmann1963 @spitta1969 Ni siquiera eso...hay que ver si los datos son reales y analizarlos. No nos olvidemos de esto: https://t.co/Zu0aM4jMVA
RT @Alejandritus23: The Lancet? Mmmm... De dónde me suena? Mmmm... Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https…
The Lancet? Mmmm... De dónde me suena? Mmmm... Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://t.co/FX4eSfpVql
@CaminhaPhD @eldiarioes No, en The Lancet NO valida** , solo pública TU paper con TUS datos y los resultados de TUS tests, es una publicación científica, que puede estar basada en datos falsos, y ser incluso retirada -como había pasado con la Wakefield, el
Account was locked due to Twitter believing that pointing out that science makes errors is misinformation. 🤦♂️ https://t.co/X58szCaNkd
@nekochik O The Lancet que habrá sentido al haber esperado 12 AÑOS en retractarse de publicar el artículo. 🤡🤡🤡 https://t.co/sRkJoZwYH2
@Piezoelectric0 @pdolan28 @reopenpa @PrincessTEF78 @kent_wimmer @ScottPaterno It is true. https://t.co/X58szCaNkd I said there’s no proof? There’s proof, it’s just unreliable.
@davidmweissman 1998 - Pre-Internets, Single publication in a British Medical Journal, linking vaccines to autism, turns 1/2 America anti-Science anti-Vax. Subsequent retraction of the study had little impact on public sentiment. America has a reality-r
@HumanProgress Yes, but it's even worse. People often don't trust science because science has been untrustworthy, and specifically on this question. We should own that. https://t.co/7vT3Xp0SUx
@MrIndianAtheist पढ़ ले ये और अपनी मूर्खता दूर कर l https://t.co/3N2xhFqxpF https://t.co/ZjGsDM7opW https://t.co/heRrOTcdZF
@Hbomberguy They expunged most of it https://t.co/FO8U3RPgY6
@VanessaLaverty @shauncrowe @Sey2S Not the Lancet! Well if they are mistaken, they’ll be right on it https://t.co/xejzB22RVu
@JoseSenco @DaleWil39870290 Read this (5 pages). There's lots of other anti Vax material for you to use. https://t.co/e0nr8ohZAV
RT @epigenwhisp: 130 Studies linking vaccines to neurological and autoimmune issues common to autism https://t.co/pNE8I8vnPa 🤡🤡🤡 https://…
RT @epigenwhisp: 130 Studies linking vaccines to neurological and autoimmune issues common to autism https://t.co/pNE8I8vnPa 🤡🤡🤡 https://…
RT @epigenwhisp: 130 Studies linking vaccines to neurological and autoimmune issues common to autism https://t.co/pNE8I8vnPa 🤡🤡🤡
RT @epigenwhisp: 130 Studies linking vaccines to neurological and autoimmune issues common to autism https://t.co/pNE8I8vnPa 🤡🤡🤡
RT @epigenwhisp: 130 Studies linking vaccines to neurological and autoimmune issues common to autism https://t.co/pNE8I8vnPa 🤡🤡🤡
Sigan creyendo que todo lo que se publica en las "grandes revistas" es confiable. https://t.co/mfQarj6KIx
@samuelmehr @NatureComms There is a distinction here between difficulty in agreeing on the rules/grounds for retraction and the difficulty in implementing agreed-upon grounds. For instance, the delay in retracing the known-to-be fraudulent Wakefield paper
@nikkiusher @drmattcarlson @latimes @brittkpeterson @HeidiTworek Not sure this totally fits (does this count as a news org?) but the Lancet's retraction of the vaccine/autism study? At first I thought of the orig story itself, but the retraction tracks mor
@PaulRya69766372 @Channel10AU @ImACelebrityAU Not a mere assertion. I feel comfortable with my comment given what he shared. And btw here's some actual scientific reading on vaccination rather than the shit he peddles https://t.co/ySUcxzrdRZ
@Cesarxavier07 @AvatarDomy Se publicó un estudio (uno) relacionando las vacunas con autismo. 12 años después la publicación de retractó por demostrarse que el estudio estuvo mal hecho https://t.co/uDKCt1bLrJ
@geostylegeo That happened with the vaccine-autism paper years ago. Caused the whole anti-vax movement. https://t.co/65GgPF8ytc
@NicklessStephen @Pedroandco_ @MaMoMVPY @berlingske Also the Lancet. https://t.co/jFsnRdSPyK
RT @boriquagato: @AnnabelKram @kerpen the lancet was trash by the late 90's. don't forget that they are the ones that published the articl…
RT @boriquagato: and let's not forget that they are the ones that set off the anti-vaxxer movement. https://t.co/cAfyXQOwTb
RT @boriquagato: and let's not forget that they are the ones that set off the anti-vaxxer movement. https://t.co/cAfyXQOwTb
RT @boriquagato: and let's not forget that they are the ones that set off the anti-vaxxer movement. https://t.co/cAfyXQOwTb
RT @boriquagato: and let's not forget that they are the ones that set off the anti-vaxxer movement. https://t.co/cAfyXQOwTb
RT @boriquagato: and let's not forget that they are the ones that set off the anti-vaxxer movement. https://t.co/cAfyXQOwTb
and let's not forget that they are the ones that set off the anti-vaxxer movement. https://t.co/cAfyXQOwTb
Anti-vaxxers: "okay!" https://t.co/7vT3Xp0SUx
@BellHappe @CHIZMAGA @DanaElizabeth69 Journals often retract and have of course publicly regretted + retracted publishing the MMR vaccine claims of Andrew Wakefield https://t.co/WwgWry5he5 Its part of science..
@delysis @jack_meditates @selentelechia You made no reference to Wakefield because (a) it would make you look even worse, and (b) antivaxxers are allergic to references. Faster to play hit-and-run, right? Wakefield was the only one making the claim. htt
Why science is so important. White women took 1 article (1998), which was retracted in 2010, about a supposed link between the MMR vaccine & developmental disorders. Mind you their N=12. 22 years later WW are afraid of vaccines. The fucking privilege.
7/El científico Andrew Wakefield publicó en la revista The Lancet un trabajo de poco rigor científico y desde 1998, la comunidad científica ha probado la seguridad y efectividad de las vacunas. Aquí algunas referencias al respecto https://t.co/8a0UOhCpcm h
Sobre movimento antivacina 1998 Lancelet publica estudo mostrando correlação entre a vacina tríplice e o autismo 2010 Lancelet retrata o artigo Desde então estudos mostraram q não há correlação Lembrem-se: mundo acadêmico não está imune às fake news https
@DevinMcloud Found the last time an article was retracted in the Lancet. It was this one in 2010. It took them 12 years to retract. There study on HQC was immediately retracted because so many doctors immediately saw errors. https://t.co/nMazRGR7hk
@aDatingDad @AmyJStu The journal that reported that doctor's false claims retracted it: https://t.co/Fo2qmuq6bZ
@ZaneWil95562747 @afneil Dr Richard Horton hahahahaha. This guy... https://t.co/8AMXBvGPzm try harder please.
@OfficeWifeVA The autism garbage was debunked. 1 flawed study by 1 doctor w/a questionable reputation. https://t.co/NJQVN78x71 - Mayo Clinic https://t.co/lzfYTKBSSR - CDC https://t.co/QHmzTqZtRK - NIH These are safe! Millions of us are proof of it.
@Andre_Lemand @Eve65392832 @sggall12 @ShannonLeigh619 @kylegriffin1 That is why they are peer-reviewed, and why the experiment must be repeatable elsewhere. The guy who said that vaccines caused autism faked his results. Not repeatable. https://t.co/Cf
@EspressoSkoonk Agreed! RE: The Autism study... https://t.co/926bV4y2Rf https://t.co/p76CT2ws1N
@BatataHelwe https://t.co/F0DM9s66wx tfadale
@PunishedRomPaul @SendMeGuap @foreverlibra93 @gayysnerd @BIkMamba link a CREDIBLE, peer reviewed study, please. https://t.co/HpnBCv3Wum
RT @mahayusa: @blogdokter Padahal ilmuan yang membuat hoax MMR sudah meminta maaf secara publik tetap saja banyak orang yang percaya samp…