@Mrs_CutiePie91 @mhayden37801 @_ActionMatters People who like their conspiracies will no doubt find fault, but here’s a starter kit. https://t.co/Q1RiuwjLqv overview https://t.co/Y6RMwN4bOF 12 year old article about the then 12 year old study being ret
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
@chrisciple @_Cultch It took 12 years and multiple investigations and was retracted on spurious lawyering funded by the pharmaceutical companies themselves. He didn't try to 'sell his own version', he tried to push the non-recombinant vaccines that predat
@twinautismmom Of course you are anti-vaxx. This is for you.... https://t.co/wtMacpfEeK
@chelle_belle51 @SarahNe39122184 @realstewpeters Every serious study in every research publication since that idiot Wakefield created the myth that lives on today. But his succors Kennedy, McCullough, Kory, Malone and other continue his awful legacy. http
@bloviate70 @Dreadful4Tymes This article is a good place to start. In short, the paper said the mmr vax caused autism, leading to people thinking that all vax would cause autism. Findings from paper were not scientifically sound, yet some still believe the
@Sidknee67920822 The claim that Wakefield was censored is so ludicrous it’s not funny. The Lancet publication was taken down because he LIED. It was a fraudulent study. And led to severe outbreaks of measles, mumps and German measles amongst children who w
@analiliamoreno @jcreyesmoreno @jainapereyra @TheLancet Pues de Sputnik se probó que habían inventado los datos y The Lancet no dijo nada. Es famoso The Lancet por hacerse 🦆, ahí se publicó el paper de Wakefield que falsamente decía que la vacuna MMR causa
RT @dotcom_nufc: @JuliaHB1 Just catching up? https://t.co/DsMDIwOwk3
RT @JenKteach: @Glinner Not for the first time https://t.co/Ms18AI2oV9
@benrayfield @foushi19 @elonmusk Yes, actually, they do retract papers. Specifically ones that cause misinformation and harm, like Andrew Wakefield's "vaccines cause autism" bs nonesense: https://t.co/QyZpGd0awC
@Glinner Not for the first time https://t.co/Ms18AI2oV9
@JuliaHB1 Just catching up? https://t.co/DsMDIwOwk3
@Burnleybelly @LayahHeilpern https://t.co/En6WWJwRiN Wow. So difficult. Research is hard. 🥲
@knownentity @jonathanstea @PeterHotez @CaulfieldTim @doritmi Here's four links about Lancet, NEJM and other science journals retractions. Many articles medical/science journals publish online get a few hundred reads. Maybe few are contested? https://t.co/
@ldjon4 @AutisticShill @respect65 Try again you silly little troll. The notion that there would be a causal link was completely obliterated decades ago. https://t.co/BbBFqN6RdE https://t.co/S0axKpdG0U
@kev_in_the_shed @jonathanstea it has more to do with wilful ignorance than intelligence and unfortunately educating the wilfully ignorant is next to impossible as showcased by the groyper i am dealing with here. https://t.co/bj0FIKqyPn
@CaligulaRedux @AngryAnnabella Uh-huh Few studies has been more damaging than the Wakefield one which millions of rubes believed and 14 years after it's retraction still believe. Despite much better studies from the same year showing no causal link. http
@mymygrant @docmommava @natsechobbyist Sadly even after the Lancet retraction Wakefield doubled down and the MMR-autism falsehood made headlines again in 2016 with the release of Vaxxed, a movie Wakefield directed that alleges a cover-up by the Centers for
@mymygrant @docmommava @natsechobbyist It is pre Q-Anon also. It goes back to a 1998 paper Lancet published by Dr. Andrew Wakefield which was retracted 12 years later in 2010. Dr. Wakefield later admitted he faked the results. So even the originator of the
@TPOnl @pjvanerp @MerlotVine @mkeulemans De Lancet (geen kleintje) heeft er 12 (!) jaar over gedaan om de bullshit van Wakefield terug te trekken: https://t.co/aOEA22dE6g Duiding hier: https://t.co/9fFqYuDmOB
9. Hoe kun je iets goed onderzoeken als onwelgevallige resultaten niet of nauwelijks gepubliceerd worden en er professionele carrière- en karaktermoord op de wetenschappers wordt gepleegd die het wagen zoiets te onderzoeken? https://t.co/wLrBFv62YY
@ThiomargaritaNA Let’s not pretend that following the peer reviewed literature is enough. You might remember a certain paper linking MMR and autism. It was published in the Lancet and only retracted 12 (twelve) years later! https://t.co/AR5OfZ1cvw
This study deserved the “Nobel Prize”.
@Dr_Bry_So_Fly Your linked journal article reminds me of this: https://t.co/Hao4YmL5D5
@drjpiper @tomfinnautor @EsmeGlaubnix Das haben sie aber doch. Siehe hier: https://t.co/Kbrv1IA5Xq
@toadmeister Failure of the peer review system is not, unfortunately, a new thing. https://t.co/DsMDIwOwk3
RT @PdKirKyoto: @Cristia22156959 @DrChavezDiaz https://t.co/J1Xdj4lnJo Lancet se ha retractado varias veces campeón. No todo lo que se publ…
@cingolani_oscar @edufeiok @ZinClaudio @guadavazquez @lanacionmas No podía faltar el conspiranoico antivacunas dando la nota 🤦🏻♂️ La falta de evidencia o la falta de método científico en producirla no es problema para el "científico de mouse"😠 https://t.
RT @PdKirKyoto: @Cristia22156959 @DrChavezDiaz https://t.co/J1Xdj4lnJo Lancet se ha retractado varias veces campeón. No todo lo que se publ…
@VozGato @_choolee @patymoon @DrChavezDiaz Te hice preguntas específicas y no las respondiste. Tu opinión está sesgada, es tonto no aceptarlo. Si, es el artículo que publicó el médico que también dice que todo está mal. Lancet también se ha retractado vari
@Cristia22156959 @DrChavezDiaz https://t.co/J1Xdj4lnJo Lancet se ha retractado varias veces campeón. No todo lo que se publica es perfecto
@Lola_mesa @GHGGuru @TheLancet Not only that, but they're the publication that published the embarrassingly flawed and completely unscientific report that "proved" that vaccines caused autism https://t.co/PxHqEoUoH4
@MikeSington THIS is the FALSE INFO that gave birth to the Anti Vaxxer movement. ONE ARTICLE!! Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://t.co/j53T2uaJo7
@Nemeses667 @Vicster82 @karamballes @Kate_Lex88 @Gem_liz31 @Aw_what @_greenandpurple @Josie19752 @AprilMay001 And I’ll take the opportunity to remind you that the Lancet had to withdraw the paper by Andrew Wakefield that falsely claimed a link between auti
RT @ShiroL96696822: @Kon__K An example our health education system need to be revamp to improve understanding of vacvine and we have to sta…
RT @ShiroL96696822: @Kon__K An example our health education system need to be revamp to improve understanding of vacvine and we have to sta…
@Kon__K An example our health education system need to be revamp to improve understanding of vacvine and we have to start that at early age to correct the wrong that made from Wakefield's study which turns people into this. @NatHutchins, @JasonClareMP http
@KimShoeCrzy @Perri4health @jchnyc1 @JCColtin @errollouis @CarolynBMaloney I’m pro vaccination and always have been. I also watched the public and parents get completely wrapped up in this issue while the media played it up. It took The Lancet (one of the
@asdhominem @Gina_DiVito @Szyzygy2 @Imani_Barbarin The Lancet also retracted the article. Admittedly 12 years after it was published, but it was retracted. https://t.co/AHpcSHOdb1
RT @cshperspectives: @Colormeblue70 @K_G_Andersen @TheLancet not always... https://t.co/1wZsCxaans
@Colormeblue70 @K_G_Andersen @TheLancet not always... https://t.co/1wZsCxaans
@Pyrimidsofdan Indeed, you gave a source that was unrelated to anything I've ever said. I can give you sources, feel stupid yet: https://t.co/niIOIOyP42
@cathydevine56 @ramboliwa @SarahSanders58 Dr Andrew Wakefield also was peer reviewed https://t.co/n2eNStqUav
@freddieminelli @jena50935479 @vladijoukov @jonrappoport Wrong again. They retracted it 12 years after publishing it because they said “several elements” were incorrect. Not one word about falsified data. https://t.co/Lp1KDMyx9G
@Hexoglyphics @popjump @FatEmperor @erichhartmann @tlowdon @AWokeZombie @Humble_Analysis @RanIsraeli @denisrancourt @prof_freedom @DrEliDavid @peterpham Which one they withdrew (like the one that denigrated the HQC)... https://t.co/fwvHIHe755 Anyway Intere
@jahz127 @lucius_aurelian @MichaelCortes_ Ahí está tu revista fuente de irrefutable información. https://t.co/S5dWSaKuYd
@flitur @pandovstrochnis Ça a mis 12 ans pour que le Lancet supprime un mauvais papier sur le lien entre autisme et le vaccin MMR. En soi, un papier republié ne dit pas grand chose sur sa qualité. https://t.co/m4ttRhGCtO
@wesyang The Lancet: https://t.co/fU6vYQW80H
@kidney_boy @mikejohansenmd @JeremySussman @GidMK Not their first rodeo ... https://t.co/Q6gLjLgoeS https://t.co/IxHIWLwvqU
@Keewee63029696 @vulpine2020 @peterworby @GarySidley @AllisonPearson @VPrasadMDMPH They aren't infallible, awful mistakes have been made. This is particularly painful one for me... https://t.co/WxE6FrkNtM
@AndyMetOrtho @AleksiReito @DrNikhilVerma @jbjs @TheLancet The Lancet has a history of publishing manuscript of questionable validity that have caused public mistrust in the medical community. A journal can redact an article but once you place it in the pu
@atrupar @chrislhayes This anti vaccine crap is directly tied to the Andrew Wakefield crap study planted in the "venerated" Lancet. https://t.co/SHX3ZLms2K
Remember that shitty study by Andrew Wakefield wrote that was planted in the "venerated" Lancet, that said vaccines cause autism? That was 1998. It wasn't retracted for 12 years. All this anti vaccine crap is directly linked to that and Jenny McCarthy. ht
@GRosethefirst @telltriage @CharlesBHallPhD @KeithMcCallin @MarkLevineNYC Here's the link again https://t.co/iCBxOzPaIp
@telltriage @CharlesBHallPhD @KeithMcCallin @MarkLevineNYC I was talking about Andrew Wakefield's research that linked autism to MMR vaccines. It was proven to be entirely bogus. https://t.co/iCBxOzPaIp
@sueytonius @Mishtrash @LeanneMaybe @iamjakimac @Sole51697162 @KLVeritas Sometimes lancet gets things wrong 😂 https://t.co/O87VfzJr6f
Never forget that "vaccines cause autism, N = 12" spent *12 years* in The Lancet before it was retracted. Journals turn fakes and mistakes into dirty bombs. https://t.co/WW99HiRhVp
@florianederer Seems more correlation than causation! QJE is to economics with the Lancet is to medical science https://t.co/6ymWap2qVa
@DoLesbiansTip @_cingraham @TheLancet The Wakefield article is what you want to use to discredit the importance of peer review? While it is annoying that they chose to keep it around in 2004 for the 'public interest' clicks, they finally did get it off the
@elizlipp With the anti-masking I feel like there is a bit of racism involved there as folks have in the past picked on Asians for masking - and anti-vax loons have been from both political sides for quite awhile thanks to Wakefield and The Lancet. https:
@alexandrosM Lancet also published Wakefield. https://t.co/FJCG2ZMdv0
@tavi_chocochip @jordanbpeterson Scientific community has never been wrong before? LOL....here it is...I put it up. How many authors of this paper walked back their opinions on this one? All but one! Sit down.... https://t.co/PyIzEpHzD2
@RickTheV1 @kniggliator @fleroy1974 @Diamondkfarms @IFAmedia Oh, you mean the journal that published probably the most damaging article ever to human health? See https://t.co/57wOiBucfv
@Leo_C_Freeman @Sharky_vs_Evil @TierraHenson @Tell34Truth @RACGPPresident @SwaledaleMutton @Iron_Mechanic @whykeepitup @badboyntx @1Geofferson82 @sfinn80 @BreezerGalway Because the so called whistleblower are as trustworthy as 1998 paper it published by Dr
5/x In sum: Everything comes down to Education or lack thereof. Remember when PCP’s did not educate on the imp. of vaccines? Jenny McCarthy took the baton, Antivaxxers & Autism from the RETRACTED med. study that FALSELY🔗 thimerosal in vaccines to auti
@wlbeeton @AlexEpstein @RitaPanahi @SkyNewsAust If you don't hold the social sciences with much regard, how about this classic that produced an army of anti vaccers that took the Lancet 12 years to retract. I think you get my point surely? https://t.co/C9s
@yekdeli @marklungo @MeidasTouch @TuckerCarlson This is one of the things that started this whole nonsense (“The Lancent” ought to hang it’s head in shame for printing…!) https://t.co/bE5J8aIlBc
The part he's talking about seems to be a discussion about whether enough is being done to determine whether the MMR vaccine was harmful to children, following on from Andrew Wakefield's discredited, fraudulent (and now redacted) paper in 1998 https://t.co
@TianaTheFirst You all should stop blaming Jenny McCarthy for reading the wrong literature on vaccines and autism because she trusted Dr. Wakefield and what he did was criminal see the attached article https://t.co/XPavhv7aw3
Anniversary of retraction of the infamous MMR/autism paper. https://t.co/UbZriNTvPb
RT @AgainstCures: Reminder that it took The Lancet 12 YEARS to retract its publication of Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent antivaccine paper h…
@NotesfromtheU @GlauSciathan @WilbyHoax @sheepsleepdeep @GovRonDeSantis EXPERTS KNOW WHAT THEY ARE DOING???? ARE YOU HIGH? Lancet waited 12 years before retracting a paper that is at the heart of the Anti-Vaxx world. They are the "Experts". https://t
@Kae_Wheatbread @NoahAdler1 Because “The Lancent” medical journal didn’t do due diligence & published an article by a wackado which was based on faulty research & study…..&, as with so much else, everyone that can Google is now an “expert”&
@Melissa4Truth @jenny_leigh_g @RobertKennedyJr ...were carefully selected and some of Wakefield’s research was funded by lawyers acting for parents who were involved in lawsuits against vaccine manufacturers ...had acted unethically and had shown “callous
Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://t.co/gn4dPjTJNo
RT @RaymondMollica: @patrickhealynyt @nytopinion Fourteen? That's the data set? What is this? A paper published in The Lancet linking MMR…
RT @RaymondMollica: @patrickhealynyt @nytopinion Fourteen? That's the data set? What is this? A paper published in The Lancet linking MMR…
RT @RaymondMollica: @patrickhealynyt @nytopinion Fourteen? That's the data set? What is this? A paper published in The Lancet linking MMR…
RT @RaymondMollica: @patrickhealynyt @nytopinion Fourteen? That's the data set? What is this? A paper published in The Lancet linking MMR…
@EricBoehlert Smacks of.... https://t.co/BmSjgH4YSX
@patrickhealynyt @nytopinion Fourteen? That's the data set? What is this? A paper published in The Lancet linking MMR vaccines and autism? https://t.co/BmSjgH4YSX