@crushthebigots @wollywollygong @de6u99er @DrEricDing @DrWilliamKu Sorry if pointing out the missteps that have occurred throughout the pandemic hurts your delicate sense of being. Explain to folks about bad studies and the impact they can have. I will w
@PaiSand @Lija_No3 Es todo falso, tanto lo del mercurio como lo del autismo. El caso del autismo fue famoso. El paper de Wakefield fue retirado por The Lancet, tarde, por trucho. https://t.co/aifYgDaW2G
I have seen the effects of poorly conducted studies that are published, and when retracted or disproven, continue to cause lasting harm: 🙅 MMR vaccine and risk of autism, retracted 12 yrs later(!) continues to be a huge driver of vaccine hesitancy. https:/
@CokedB @MaxBoot In its modern incarnation? The UK... https://t.co/tkam8MukUn
RT @THEAGENTAPSLEY: @DrWMB @BeresfordPeter @CarolineJBald Why, despite critics, did Wakefield's work have any such traction ? [Unrelatedly…
@DrWMB @BeresfordPeter @CarolineJBald Why, despite critics, did Wakefield's work have any such traction ? [Unrelatedly, it took <i>The Lancet</i> twelve years to retract what https://t.co/YXP3QOsiQ4 is referring to] Why, if #Frump said drink
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
@8BFubIjPE1I2nNL @BojanJankovi Da li možete da mi pošaljete citat gde mogu da proverim izvor ove informacije? Takodje ako samo malo proučite temu autizma shvatićete da je taj jedan jedini rad koji je tvrdio vezu autizma i vakcinacije povučen iz publikacije
@Lumawkin @JamesDelingpole @abiroberts https://t.co/nykXVeYtCW I just googled this for your reference. The Lancet were considered very blameworthy by some parents because the flawed research they published from AW was directly the cause of many children's
@_ZhN_ @n_led Именно в Ланцете опубликовали статью о связи вакцин и аутизма, которую автор вывел на выборке из 12 детей и за которую его ссаными тряпками погнали из научного сообщества. https://t.co/cYQSD4I8h3
Bilimsel dergiler de dezenformasyonda ara sıra da olsa rol oynuyorlar.. Wakefield ın MMR aşısı ve Otizm ilişkisi konusundaki sahte araştırması da LANCET de yayınlanmıştı. https://t.co/1kocgaGkn2
@CentristGirl @StandingforXX Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://t.co/jApqqTCfJL
@TJBirchok @chknnugzRfamily @ahugetroll @BadgerOC1 I can do this all day. https://t.co/2OFRutdM3H
Some researchers have taken advantage of this over time, most notably Andrew Wakefield, who scammed the Lancet into publishing his ginned up study purporting to link autism to childhood vaccination, all to promote his financial interests. https://t.co/HxEV
Toute ressemblance avec Christopher Portier et les avocats en dommage contre Monsanto, dont le fameux Litzenburg, ne serait que coincidence... Non les #predatort n'existent pas.
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
Quasiment la même manip. que Portier au sujet du glyphosate.
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
@ferparga @YoginideMaiz @lximenezfyvie @StratCons ¿En serio? De todas maneras no es una patente de corso para dichas publicaciones. ¿Quién no recuerda el fatídico artículo que le dio impulso a los antivax? https://t.co/toWBJV27Rn
RT @mememoreme: @B52Malmet I feel terrible for people who were misled to believe vaccinations caused autism. https://t.co/pu2YrQ6Tkr
RT @mememoreme: @B52Malmet I feel terrible for people who were misled to believe vaccinations caused autism. https://t.co/pu2YrQ6Tkr
@B52Malmet I feel terrible for people who were misled to believe vaccinations caused autism. https://t.co/pu2YrQ6Tkr
@K_Sheldrick Elisabeth Bik has had some depressingly similar experiences. And the paper of notorious fraud Andrew Wakefield took 12 years to get retracted from the Lancet: https://t.co/smnWnlyWrv
I'm sorry, this denial of life saving mmr vaccines has been going on for 20-25 years. I guess I was clued in when I had kids 10-15 years ago. https://t.co/Q7Mz35ux0G
@JMStYves1968 @JulCaron @LeaStreliski C'est The Lancet qui avait publié ça et qui l'a depuis retiré. Elle a pas inventé ça. https://t.co/s4zrOGMLlw
@mhweb @TauSgt @ksorbs I do listen to those across the spectrum. When something is discredited or proven wrong I accept it and apply it to current thinking. I initially allowed for the theory below. I then discounted it for obvious reasons. https://t.co/
RT @ValeBodi: @davidtuller1 @WhereFrancis @awgaffney @MBVanElzakker The Lancet published A. Wakefield’s paper on the MMR vaccine “link” to…
@davidtuller1 @WhereFrancis @awgaffney @MBVanElzakker The Lancet published A. Wakefield’s paper on the MMR vaccine “link” to autism as a matter of fact. So I would not keep it on any high pedestal as far as an authoritative and truly science based medical
@SirajAHashmi wait... The Lancet... it reminds me of something... oh.. https://t.co/gZ46hgINma
@DerryBanShee @Queen_Jezebel_ @davecurtis314 @TheLancet They have, 12 years too late though! https://t.co/oJFi80H7cF
@eldogewhisperer @ulfhamrta @StarZimmerman6 @jprngw @RickLeventhal @chrisrock watch the video I linked, many are shown there. If not, I can find tons in 2 seconds.. here are just a few: https://t.co/Gb2ZEb9drI https://t.co/OKmns3VxRt https://t.co/2UK14o3Ej
@Joffan7 @GeorgeMonbiot Don't be daft! It started with Andrew Wakefield's now discredited article in the Lancet, which they withdrew in 2010, not with any political faction. https://t.co/MNNztGThUg
@richardastonson @KiwiRational @ajthompson13 Yet borne out by history: https://t.co/pbwl7GRLzj Anti-vaxers natural human fears were caught by misinformation and research not replicated.
@SeanLNelson1 @bednarcheryl50 @McFaul The Lancet retracted its support. Wakefield is a fraudster, definitely not a scholar. He has no interest in patient rights, just his own self interest. Vaccines save lives, fraudulent studies such as Wakefield's cause
RT @MrMojoRisin510: @dontlickchalk You can start by slapping Jenny McCarthy silly. She is the one who propagated that lie that vaccines cau…
@dontlickchalk You can start by slapping Jenny McCarthy silly. She is the one who propagated that lie that vaccines cause autism. Then refer them to resources like this showing that the "study" that linked autism to vaccines was flawed and has been retra
@Seaord1 @GidMK I doubt that. Recollect Lancet in '99 published Andrew Wakefield's article later retracted with which launched him as a public figure. https://t.co/k5DYFplp7E
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
CC @zaruk #predatorts SlimeGate Part 4.1 – Predatorts and NGOs (Introduction): Liars for Hire https://t.co/ip6rZo1VB5
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
RT @MMeBlackSheep: 1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un…
1° chose: 2 ans avant l'étude, Wakefield a été recruté par l'avocat Richard Barr, ce dernier étant en train de monter un dossier contre les fabricants de vaccin pour des parents antivax https://t.co/S2r39aH3Rn il a payé Wakefield 435 000£ pour qu'il lui f
@RaeUK Ironic that this statement about incorrect scientific information is from the Lancet. https://t.co/11QuvriVBL ...it only took 12 years. I wonder how much the Lancet has contributed to the COVID vaccine hesitancy.
@vergecrypto @NXRazzalyn @mistymeadow22 @GillianMcKeith the publishing journal even retracted it https://t.co/YQj8so21R3
@Fradbius @jordimartifont_ 2/però l'article de retractació que em dius no és una retractació de l'informe que t'he ensenyat. Direm també que The Lancet és una revista sospitosa d'antivacunes?: https://t.co/3kr9HFVJPD
RT @TheSeeker268: #TIL
@JoeMcA90 @NWPool09 @BennettArron His ideas have been debunked by them. These anti-vax ideas can have “dramatic health consequences” when they are given too much publicity, as the Lancet found to its cost and ours. https://t.co/9Zds8z2XTd
RT @TheSeeker268: #TIL
RT @TheSeeker268: #TIL
RT @TheSeeker268: #TIL
Vaccine hesitancy, when did it become a big deal?
RT @TheSeeker268: #TIL
RT @TheSeeker268: #TIL
RT @TheSeeker268: #TIL
RT @TheSeeker268: #TIL
@farahsal90 @Rach_Danielle_ @ktumulty Oh yes the lancet article that started all this non-sense. It was retracted! I swear most people talk but rarely do they read. https://t.co/7rGezZZM5R
RT @Mznewzz: ICYMI Here’s an overview of the original paper that set off the whole antivax movement. Effects: *12 years to retract *a gen…
RT @D4Real8645: 🔥 This is important if you want to know where all this anti-vaxx BS started. It’s unbelievable. One fraudulent paper publis…
RT @D4Real8645: 🔥 This is important if you want to know where all this anti-vaxx BS started. It’s unbelievable. One fraudulent paper publis…
ICYMI Here’s an overview of the original paper that set off the whole antivax movement. Effects: *12 years to retract *a gen of too many uninnoculated kids *you know about today https://t.co/NXvdLWxYco
@cherilyntudiosa Tienes toda la razón, era la triple. https://t.co/CHTshGQxeB
Irresponsible publication can cause lasting harm as seen historically by the MMR vaccine - autism debacle. Years after this paper was retracted, families still believe this to be true. https://t.co/Bw1xZIbrkW
@itscmonsta It’s because there is NO SCIENCE in the anti-vaccination movement, no facts all. This all began with a scientific article that made an unfounded link between vaccines and autism. This article was retracted (unfortunately 12 years later) https:/
RT @marenbennette: @allthecitizens @richardhorton1 Horton. The man who failed to take down the anti-MMR rubbish from the Lancet website for…
@AlidiSkuse Horton. The man who failed to take down the anti-MMR rubbish from the Lancet website for 12 years. I wouldn't trust a word he utters on any subject whatsoever. https://t.co/8TI3DnU4aC
@implausibleblog Horton. The man who failed to take down the anti-MMR rubbish from the Lancet website for 12 years. I wouldn't trust a word he utters on any subject whatsoever. https://t.co/8TI3DnU4aC
@Jill4life3 Horton. The man who failed to take down the anti-MMR rubbish from the Lancet website for 12 years. I wouldn't trust a word he utters on any subject whatsoever. https://t.co/8TI3DnU4aC
@cathymac4030 Horton. The man who failed to take down the anti-MMR rubbish from the Lancet website for 12 years. I wouldn't trust a word he utters on any subject whatsoever. https://t.co/8TI3DnU4aC
@allthecitizens @richardhorton1 Horton. The man who failed to take down the anti-MMR rubbish from the Lancet website for 12 years. I wouldn't trust a word he utters on any subject whatsoever. https://t.co/8TI3DnU4aC
@myep00 @ThomasFo @journal_court @Alpha_Mind7 Wtf're you even on abt? It has been proven time n time again in every country with a brain tht vaccines do not cause autism. It was a hoax, the Lancet established that and Wakefield was struck off which is why
@KatherineEban @TheLancet @PeterDaszak @TheLancet also helped spread the MMR vaccine tied to autism BS. https://t.co/eod831uOYK That in itself has hurt so many people and continues to do so today. Why is it still a "respected" medicine journal?
@unherd @pegobry @ianbirrell Are you referring to this Lancet? The one that started the autism/vaccine hysteria? https://t.co/8aIAUTqa1I The one that published a wildly and laughably inflated estimate of civilian deaths in Iraq? https://t.co/3E0rBee59j The
@Ghostlore If history matters to you: https://t.co/CHYmkjOHxz
@rez_elle @hagmonk @_BarringtonII A controversial 1998 study proposed a link between autism and the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine. However, that study has been debunked by other research and was eventually retracted in 2010. https://t.co/LeQd6
@rob_england A v. good thing, and something alt med doesn’t do, but psychology, medicine, biological sciences, sociology, economics, etc does. Social psychology has the most problems with replication and generalisability. In terms of harm, may be one of th
Oh, and then there is this... https://t.co/KvpeNeFV2r
The Lancet, uno de los más prestigiosos journals científicos, tardó 12 años en retractar un artículo que asociaba la triple vacuna (sarampión, paperas y rubeola) con autismo: https://t.co/Ewz2zIe3Tz
@Rama35008819 @Nature @TheLancet @aaas @NSF @NIHDirector Lancet has had no credibility from the time of the MMR vaccine scam https://t.co/9APaoBXlCr
@angie_rasmussen @LTrain18 @K_G_Andersen We are told we are being lied to by politicians and medical professionals. We are told that "well... science changes" (and this is true) but then to follow the science...and not question it. If you question it you