@ThesiMastermind @jajajandra @FlorHalfon @FabBallarini Ya se encargaron de estudiar eso Y NO ENCONTRARON NADA. El tipo que dijo que producían autismo mintió. La misma revista que lo publicó salió a decir que era mentira, tergiversó sus resultados. https:/
RT @jaredrrt: @ArawakSky @JamesTodaroMD @TheLancet @MRMehraMD The Lancet has been here before. https://t.co/AUk5WdSLyu
RT @jaredrrt: @ArawakSky @JamesTodaroMD @TheLancet @MRMehraMD The Lancet has been here before. https://t.co/AUk5WdSLyu
History is repeating itself. Last time when Lancet published rubbish paper linking Autism to MMR vaccine, it took them 12 years to retract the paper. What do you plan this time @richardhorton1? Is the #who with you? @doctorsoumya to note https://t.co/mStiq
RT @jaredrrt: @ArawakSky @JamesTodaroMD @TheLancet @MRMehraMD The Lancet has been here before. https://t.co/AUk5WdSLyu
RT @jaredrrt: @ArawakSky @JamesTodaroMD @TheLancet @MRMehraMD The Lancet has been here before. https://t.co/AUk5WdSLyu
@ArawakSky @JamesTodaroMD @TheLancet @MRMehraMD The Lancet has been here before. https://t.co/AUk5WdSLyu
RT @MisterDang: @deanbc1 @ScottAdamsSays @RudyGiuliani Lancet is pathetic. Has been for years. https://t.co/ExvqifF20S
@FelipecOjeda @oatila https://t.co/AbvxmMzkNv A Revista Lancet, uma das mais acreditadas e sérias, levou 12 anos para se retratar de um artigo publicado que foi/é usado pelos antivacinas, ligando vacinas ao autismo. Merdas acontecem, mesmo em revistas cie
@DanielMcDonald4 How about this one for starters, Mr. Gullible: https://t.co/kORSQDFqSC
RT @MisterDang: @deanbc1 @ScottAdamsSays @RudyGiuliani Lancet is pathetic. Has been for years. https://t.co/ExvqifF20S
@nytimes The Lancet-the publication that was almost singlehandedly responsible for the anti-vaxxer movement. https://t.co/6sORNuMCu3
@richardhorton1 Your publication also had a very negative effect on medicine, as you may remember... https://t.co/6sORNuMCu3
@Forbes One of the world's most respected medical journals... https://t.co/6sORNuMCu3
@RT_com How about the magazine that almost singlehandedly started the anti-vaccine movement by publishing an article linking vaccines and autism, and which they had to retract? That's what I would call them. https://t.co/6sORNuMCu3
@knotgirl1 'She also decried the “millions, if not tens of millions of dollars” that have been spent on additional studies to validate or disqualify the original Wakefield study.' Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://
@passantino The Lancet also bolstered the anti-vax movement. So... https://t.co/Xh9305rnRH
RT @James83031439: @feelzezeitgeizt @MillerCrime @josephcotten2 https://t.co/ByzaxnDbEl Although I'm sure there's a conspiracy as to why t…
RT @James83031439: @feelzezeitgeizt @MillerCrime @josephcotten2 https://t.co/ByzaxnDbEl Although I'm sure there's a conspiracy as to why t…
@feelzezeitgeizt @MillerCrime @josephcotten2 https://t.co/ByzaxnDbEl Although I'm sure there's a conspiracy as to why this was retracted too. Good thing they weren't very good at it and it took them 12 years to put their NWO conspiracy into effect, right?
@jespet71 Det finns otroligt mycket att läsa på om här (https://t.co/20XHonc4jE) och han som var ansvarig får inte lov att jobba inom medicin längre. Just pga av att han helt enkelt spred lögner.
@richardhorton1 You've got a cheek making comments on SAGE scientists Your fake news anti vaxxer article risked a pandemic https://t.co/plEQP0w7Q7
@wrongthinkQC Richard Horton published an incorrect report linking MMR to autism in the @TheLancet (the same Lancet that the cultists are now holding up to be the all seeing eye for Corona science, including criticising SAGE) https://t.co/plEQP0w7Q7
@Trumpwillwin2 @EdwardTHardy Anti-vaxxers base their Autism beliefs off a study of just 12 children. https://t.co/9ymJJKMp2a
RT @edsperr: @HannahC_MLIS Indeed! The preponderance of pre-prints is an issue, but we should never forget that *ndrew W*kefield got his…
@HannahC_MLIS Indeed! The preponderance of pre-prints is an issue, but we should never forget that *ndrew W*kefield got his nonsense published in the Lancet (It took them 12 years to retract it: https://t.co/CmEsvq5p0U)
@TC1984G So... you *do* then, after all, favor evidence over things like https://t.co/MachpjiU3u which was retracted based on " “several elements” of a 1998 paper it published by Dr. Andrew Wakefield … “are incorrect, contrary to the findings of an earlier
@Javier_Pimentel @fidelcanoco @PJaramilloValen @pcorrea78 @elespectador Por último, muchos procesos de crítica en revistas científicas, o la evidencia de errores posteriores, ha llevado en no pocas ocasiones, a los que los investigadores, y la revista deba
@DrNathanT @RonGeorge_Dubai @peter__leo @guadua Side note: the fake-fact that vaccines would cause autism was published in Lancet (peer-reviewed). So, probably that's a bad argument. https://t.co/9WW7ra9AvB
@Kellyrich3331 @realDonaldTrump @P01YN0NYM0U55 @jamandatrtl Oh, and Lancet retracted the article that said that vaccines cause autism. https://t.co/DXrDWYpJi4
@dasingleton @RichLowry @jimgeraghty I understand what are you saying and it is probably true, but history has shown that not all scinetists are moral and ethical beings (https://t.co/KYQRGBgX8r - caused antivaxxers movement)
And before anyone rushes to deny his non-denouncement of anti-vaxing scaring: https://t.co/tS6Bdoff92
@_bhickman @AbeDenmark The Lancet? Where have I heard that name before? https://t.co/WZO3Yo5SJP
Horton is the one who published the Wakefield paper blaming vaccination for autism https://t.co/uwawAfiflr & uses The Lancet to demonise Israel https://t.co/RaZ8Bgr9DC Judge him accordingly
@semicollegiate @RachelDTobias https://t.co/eZTRzAJPDa Like that one? Or more like https://t.co/MachpjiU3u ?
@ceestave @RealMadDadMAGA @mangojuliana @StevenSalzberg1 @DrWakefield He was not exonerated. The study was discredited, proven fraudulent in 2010. Wakefield was stripped of all medical credentials which have never been restored. Since then no studies have
@waynemarsh44 @wizardtechny @aber6120 @BreitbartNews You're citing The Lancet? The publication that has retracted many articles, notably about the link between vaccines and autism. That Lancet? https://t.co/9Fplc3sDip https://t.co/6DErTuDqlJ
@jeremyrhammond @Golfergirl2018 @bobbytg1stu @JeremyHammond Something you wrote that isn't true. Identified & linked! You wrote this lie. https://t.co/dk7W93Of3G And the lancet study was proven to be false by the publishers. https://t.co/bO1KBgfC0X
@jeremyrhammond @Golfergirl2018 @bobbytg1stu @JeremyHammond Something you wrote that isn't true. Identified & linked! You wrote this lie. https://t.co/dk7W93Of3G And the lancet study was proven to be false by the publishers. https://t.co/bO1KBgfC0X
@jeremyrhammond @Golfergirl2018 @bobbytg1stu @JeremyHammond What you wrote that isn't true and doesn't logically follow. You wrote this article. https://t.co/dk7W93Of3G And the lancet study was proven to be false by the publishers. https://t.co/bO1KBgfC0X
@jeremyrhammond @Golfergirl2018 @bobbytg1stu @JeremyHammond Lie 1 Your claims about Palestine and Israel are all wrong. https://t.co/x04dzx6Brl Lie 2 You wrote this article. https://t.co/dk7W93Of3G And the lancet study was proven to be false by the publis
@CARRIE4TRUTH Anyway happy retraction day to the quack Andrew Wakefield, whose discredited, fabricated results are responsible for thousands of preventable deaths and the ongoing abuse of autistic people https://t.co/Uy9wKW3L8T
Lancet'i yayını geri çekmesi üzerine kaleme alınmış bir ek bilgi makalesi ➡️ https://t.co/sYfZlCjY12
RT @DanielJDrucker: @jillpromoli @picardonhealth @4jude4everyone @JennyMcCarthy And yet, often overlooked is the role of the @TheLancet Des…
@jillpromoli @picardonhealth @4jude4everyone @JennyMcCarthy And yet, often overlooked is the role of the @TheLancet Despite numerous inquiries, protests, trials, red flags, it refused to act and let untold damage and measles epidemic unfold, until it could
@stpdtwtrname @TijanTijan87 Vaccines doesn't cause autism. The only study to ever suggest it do was retracted after it was found that not only was the methodology flawed but the study was funded by litigtants in a lawsuit against vaccine manufacturers. h
RT @GastonFRodrigu1: Twelve years after publishing a landmark study that turned tens of thousands of parents around the world against the m…
Twelve years after publishing a landmark study that turned tens of thousands of parents around the world against the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine because of an implied link between vaccinations and autism, The Lancet has retracted the paper.
Well actually... Andrew Wakefield did do a “study” and falsified the results. It’s when other scientists started to examine the methods, etc that everything fell apart. This is why people believed him. https://t.co/EW0EkT4Tnp
RT @keddieff: @CMAJ @AndreasLaupacis @DocSandyB @CMA_Docs @carlabrc Thx for this. I'm already putting public access to @CMA_Docs to good us…
@CMAJ @AndreasLaupacis @DocSandyB @CMA_Docs @carlabrc Thx for this. I'm already putting public access to @CMA_Docs to good use! e.g. from 2010: "Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines" https://t.co/GBqaW4roxb #VaccinesWork #Meas
Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines. This is worth another share. https://t.co/6y9PTHwMxa
@CuresCancer Science is corrupted. Sure thing. Not even going to linked to Wakefield’s retracted Lancet study? https://t.co/f6aTc7teGu
RT @crabb_vicki: @Wallace_Noll @urbanx_f No, it remains retracted. It was never about the topic. Wakefield lied about his methods, he subje…
@Wallace_Noll @urbanx_f No, it remains retracted. It was never about the topic. Wakefield lied about his methods, he subjected children to unapproved, unnecessary testing, and his study was funded by a group seeking compensation. His study has never been r
@ZaidJilani Remember this doozy? Lancet retracts 12-year-old article linking autism to MMR vaccines https://t.co/EMe7QsLhLk
@Douglas__K @Dianora_1 Though that was originally published in a peer-reviewed journal! https://t.co/I3GWxSgboR
RT @itsnasheeth: "Scientific" claims by the Anti-Vaxxers are mostly based on a discredited research by a person called Wakefield. More need…
RT @itsnasheeth: "Scientific" claims by the Anti-Vaxxers are mostly based on a discredited research by a person called Wakefield. More need…
@paul_kangas Vaccines do not cause autism. The initial study was found to be fraudulent, retracted and disproven. Everyone should know this. https://t.co/busXMskrVt
RT @itsnasheeth: "Scientific" claims by the Anti-Vaxxers are mostly based on a discredited research by a person called Wakefield. More need…
RT @itsnasheeth: "Scientific" claims by the Anti-Vaxxers are mostly based on a discredited research by a person called Wakefield. More need…
RT @itsnasheeth: "Scientific" claims by the Anti-Vaxxers are mostly based on a discredited research by a person called Wakefield. More need…
"Scientific" claims by the Anti-Vaxxers are mostly based on a discredited research by a person called Wakefield. More needs to be done to educate the public that Wakefield's [retracted] paper was discredited by the wider medical & scientific community:
@Patrici41859934 You do know that it has been proven many times that there is absolutely no link between autism & vaccines. The findings were withdrawn and 100% disproven. This has been well documented over the years. Just thought you should know. htt
@nordstelo @johncarlosbaez In 1998 a paper linking autism to vaccines had been published by the medical journal The Lancet. While the study has since been discredited and the paper retracted (see https://t.co/IZDN3nwLY2), the damage it has caused in the fo
@LorianaPatterso @idoNotComply @BrunTheBear @marciatcarter @agvBruceAdams @Urisoli It was retracted by the journal it was published in, The Lancet because the scientific methodology was crap and the research was "funded by lawyers acting for parents who we
@TruthVax https://t.co/tia1wTQotm retracted
Ιςως δεν ξέρει ούτε η κυρία που το ζει... https://t.co/TqlxXKia4r
https://t.co/oPy2ieyrky 12 anos depois, a verdade é reposta
@evrimagaci 20. Aşı karşıtlarına karşı argüman üretsem meta-analizlere yer verirdim ama ezici deliller olarak bu iki yazıyı referans olarak vermezdim. Kanıttan ziyade daha çok kafa karışıklığı ve şüphe uyandırıyor. Wakefield ilgili yazı da şuydu: https://t
Important: many well-read #antivaxxers say 'the science goes way past Wakefield, we don't need him." But @RobertKennedyJr wants "a statue for Andy Wakefield." Recall he did not just have a study retracted which is not a disgrace but he lost his license, h
RT @TheScepticalDoc: Statement published on Feb. 2010, the @bmj_company states that, it is now clear that “several elements” of a 1998 pape…
@DrSelcukOzdemir @SelcukRSirin Maalesef deli saçmalığı, hem araştırma saçma hem dergi hata yapmış ancak dergi özür dilese de hala sahtebilime inanlar var: https://t.co/7LYZnt8T1d
RT @TheScepticalDoc: Statement published on Feb. 2010, the @bmj_company states that, it is now clear that “several elements” of a 1998 pape…
Statement published on Feb. 2010, the @bmj_company states that, it is now clear that “several elements” of a 1998 paper it published by Dr. Andrew Wakefield and his colleagues “are incorrect, contrary to the findings of an earlier investigation.” https://
@LadyRegalli @damnyouwillis The Lancet “study” has been debunked more often than Bill Maher has a second thought. https://t.co/JyxQVNPqZT There have been exactly zero other studies that reached this conclusion.
@LouiseStephen9 We are talking of the same publication at the origin of the antivax debacle https://t.co/PrBQNBwMjI
@KatharinaBrecht Would cherrypicking qualify? The most harmful article in the history of public health https://t.co/WvMQGfRrxp